Rajeev v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner vehicle seizure challenge closed. Fine remitted and vehicles released via interim order making the interim order absolute.
What did the court decide?
the writ petition is closed by making the interim order for release of vehicles absolute.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 761 OF 2013
PETITIONERS:
1 RAJEEV S/O. RAJU, RAJEEV BHAVAN, AREEKKARA, P.O. MULAKUZHA, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
2 ROBY VARGHESE S/O. VARGHESE, PARANKAMANVIL HOUSE, KUNNAMTHANAM P.O., MALLAPPALLY, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.ANCHAL C.VIJAYAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAJEEV
- petitioner
ROBY VARGHESE
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ALAPPUZHA
- respondent
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NOORANADU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court