Zeenath K.M. v. the Secretary, Karumalloor Panchayath
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court noted the writ petition regarding dangerous trees was admitted in 2015 but never disposed. It directed the petitioner to file a reminder and noted the matter was closed, leaving contentions open for future proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to approach respondents with reminders to the original complaints.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(C) NO.7065 OF 2015
PETITIONER :-
ZEENATH K.M., AGED 42 YEARS W/O.ABOO, RESIDING AT CHERIKKALLUMMAL (H), KARUMALLOOR P.O, THAMARAMUKKU.
BY ADV SMT.P.Y.SHEHEERA
RESPONDENTS :-
1 THE SECRETARY, KARUMALLOOR PANCHAYATH PARAVOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 501.
2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER FORT KOCHI P.O, PIN-682 001. 3 MR. KALAM KALLIKKUZHIVEEDU, KARUMALLOOR P.O, MANAKKAPPADY, PIN-683 511. BY ADVS. SMT.T.T.JOSEPHINE SRI.V.SANKARA RAJA SRI.APPU P.S., GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed for directions to remove dangerous trees requires a fresh representation to the respondents as the original was pending.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Zeenath K.M.
- respondent
The Secretary, Karumalloor Panchayath
- respondent
The Revenue Divisional Officer
- respondent
Mr. Kalam Kallikkuzhiveedu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court