Sudhamony v. Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that disputed questions of fact could not be decided in this writ petition. The petitioner was directed to approach the Panchayat with a representation.
What did the court decide?
Directed the petitioner to approach the Panchayat with a proper representation for consideration with notice to all concerned.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 22ND JYAISHTA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 6284 OF 2014
PETITIONER:
SUDHAMONY
AMBATTUKUNNEL, CHUNKAPPARA, MALLAPPALLY TALUK,
PATHANAMTHITTA
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.HARIDAS
SMT.S.SIKKY
SRI.P.C.SHIJIN
RESPONDENTS:
1 SECRETARY KOTTANGAL GRAMA PANCHAYATHU, KOTTANGAL P O, MALLAPPALLY-686547
2 KOTTANGAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE, KOTTANGAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOTTANGAL P O, MALLAPPALLY, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, KOTTANGAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE, KOTTANGAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOTTANGAL P O, MALLAPPALLY 686547, PATHANAMTHITTA
3 SONI P GEORGE S/O.GEORGE VARGHESE, PONNARATHANKUZHY, CHUNGAPPARA-686547
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether disputed questions of fact should be adjudicated upon in a writ petition at this stage.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sudhamony
- respondent
Secretary Kottangal Grama Panchayathu
- respondent
Kottangal Grama Panchayath Committee
- respondent
Soni P George
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court