Viju v. District Geologist
Case brief
What is this about?
On the merits of the matter
What did the court decide?
Leave to withdraw the writ petition in favor of the petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 26TH MAGHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 4037 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
VIJU
AGED 38 YEARS
S/O CHANDRA BABU, KOODATHIL VEEDU, KURAKKADA.P.O.,
KIZHIVILAM, TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695104
BY ADVS.
S.K.ADHITHYAN
BHAVYA BINU
RESPONDENTS:
1DISTRICT GEOLOGIST
MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENT OF MINING &
GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTOM PALACE P.O.
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004
2THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
POTHENCODE MURUKKUMPUZHA ROAD, NH 66, MANGALAPURAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695501
SRI.APPU.P.S-GP
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Viju
- respondent
District Geologist
- respondent
The Station House Officer
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court