C.v.James v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted leave and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal principle was laid down.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2023 / 30TH ASHADHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 3621 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
C.V.JAMES, PARTNER, AGED 67 YEARS SUKHODAYAM AYURVEDIC PHARMACEUTICALS AND HOSPITALS, B.NO.15, KANPRAPPALLY P.O., KOTTAYAM, MUDAMPALLIL HOUSE, KANJIRAPPALLY KARA, KANJIRAPPALLY VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686 507.
BY ADVS. V.JAYAPRASAD SRI.AYPE JOSEPH
RESPONDENT/S:
1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI110001.
2 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY GOVERNOR, CENTRAL OFFICE, SHAHID BHAGATH SINGH ROAD, MUMBAI-400 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.V. JAMES AND ORS.
- respondent
UNION OF INDIA
- respondent
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
- respondent
THE CHAIRMAN KERALA BIO-DIVERSITY BOARD
- respondent
AUTHORIZED OFFICER CANARA BANK
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court