Damodaran Dileep v. N.Prakasan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed unaccepted memo dismissing writ petition for not pressed.Brief procedural order dismissing the petition as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 10TH KARTHIKA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 29811 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
DAMODARAN DILEEP KUMAR
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O.DAMODARAN, CHERUVILA VEEDU, CHETTIYARKONAM,
PALLIMUKKU, KADAKKAL, KOLLAM - 691 536.
BY ADV G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENTS:
1 N.PRAKASAN
AGE NOT KNOWN S/O.NANDANAM, SAROJ, PALLIMUKKU, KOLLAM -
691 536.
2 THE TALUK SURVEYOR
MINI CIVIL STATION, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM - 691 506.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DAMODARAN DILEEP KUMAR
- respondent
N.PRAKASAN
- respondent
THE TALUK SURVEYOR
- respondent
THE TAHASILDAR
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court