Biju.M.Philip, v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a writ petition for not being pressed, given the petitioner's failure to argue.
What did the court decide?
Discontinued
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023/7TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 28687 OF 2020
PETITIONER:
BIJU.M.PHILIP,
S/O. MELUTTU PHILIP, VAYALINKAROTTU,
ELAKALLOOR P.O, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA
REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
MANOJ M. PHILIP AGED 44,
S/O. MELUTTU PHILIP,
VAYALINKAROTTU,
ELAKALLOOR P.O, KONNI,
PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
V.PHILIP MATHEW
SRI.JEPH JOSEPH
RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST, NEW DELHI - 110 003.
2 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, 2ND FLOOR, COLLECTORATE RD, CHITTOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA, KERALA - 689 645.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BIJU.M.PHILIP
- respondent
UNION OF INDIA
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
- respondent
THE TAHSILDHAR
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court