Dismissed

Sheela v. the Secretary

Kerala HC18 Oct 2023WP(C)/27919/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner before this court. No substantive reasons given.

What the court decided

AI extract

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 27919 OF 2023

¶4

PETITIONER:

¶5

SHEELA

¶6

AGED 52 YEARS
W/O LATE MOHANAN, ARACKAL HOUSE, ANNAMANADA DESOM,
KALLUR THEKKUMURI VILLAGE, ANNAMANADA P.O,
CHALAKKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN – 680 741.

¶7

BY ADVS.
ANAND KALYANAKRISHNAN
C.DHEERAJ RAJAN

¶8

RESPONDENTS:

¶9

1 THE SECRETARY ROAD TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHALAKKUDY, SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN – 680 307.

¶10

2 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD, 2ND FLOOR, THEKKEKARA COMMERCIAL CENTRE, PADIVATTOM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN – 682 024.

¶11

Sheela Vs the Secretary — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2023)

¶31

`PETITIONER’S EXH` `Exhibit P1`	`IBITS` `THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF` `REGISTRATION PERTAINING TO THE VEHICLE` `BEARING REGISTRATION NUMBER KL-02-AW-2244`
`Exhibit P2`	`THE TRUE COPY OF THE CONTRACT CARRIAGE PERMIT` `DATED 15.12.2017 PERTAINING TO THE VEHICLE` `BEARING REGISTRATION NUMBER KL-02-AW-2244` `ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT HEREIN`
`Exhibit P3`	`THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14.12.2022` `ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT` `OFFICER`
`Exhibit P4`	`THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 24.01.2023` `SEND BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN TO THE 2ND` `RESPONDENT HEREIN`
`Exhibit P5`	`THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED` `24.01.2023 EVIDENCING THE FACTUM OF SENDING` `OF EXT P4 LETTER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT HEREIN`
`Exhibit P6`	`THE TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN C.C 166/2020` `DATED 22.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER` `AGAINST THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND HIS OTHER` `COMPANIES BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER` `DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THRISSUR`
`Exhibit P7`	`THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED` `21.02.2023 SEEKING 'CHANGE IN THE NAME OF THE` `OWNER OF THE VEHICLE IN R.C PARTICULARS`
`Exhibit P8`	`THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.03.2023` `IN WPC 4044/2023 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT`
`Exhibit P9`	`THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.06.2023` `PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT HEREIN`

Sheela v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.K.v.N. Impex P Ltd. Vs the Joint Director, Directorate General of GST Intelligence

Asamannoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. NO.317., Vs the Income Tax Officer WARD-2

Babu Abraham Vs Regional Transport Authority

M/S. Trans Asian Shipping Services (P) Ltd. Vs the Assessing Officer

Sheela v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.K.v.N. Impex P Ltd. Vs the Joint Director, Directorate General of GST Intelligence

Asamannoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. NO.317., Vs the Income Tax Officer WARD-2

Babu Abraham Vs Regional Transport Authority

M/S. Trans Asian Shipping Services (P) Ltd. Vs the Assessing Officer

A compact analysis

M/S Mermer Italia Building Products (P) Ltd, Vs the Deputy Commissioner

M/S Ajwa Dry Fruit Impex , Vs Union of India