S.D. Pradeep v. Biju
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed a writ petition filed since 2014 for non-prosecution, noting that the petitioner did not appear during the revised call for admission on 03.08.2023.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner to be treated as non-prosecuting and the writ petition is subsequently dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 26099 OF 2014
PETITIONER:
S.D. PRADEEP
PRATHIBHA NIVAS, ILAKAMON P.O,
KIZHAKKEPURAM, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
BY ADV SRI.M.TRIPTEN
RESPONDENTS:
1 BIJU THUNDUVILAVEEDU, THEKKUMBHAGAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001
2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THAMPANOOR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001
3 REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER
R.T. OFFICE, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition remaining pending since 2014 should be dismissed when the petitioner fails to appear during the call?
Does the failure of the petitioner to prosecute the writ petition warrant dismissal for non-prosecution?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.D. PRADEEP
- respondent
BIJU THUNDUVILAVEEDU
- respondent
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THAMPANOOR
- respondent
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER
- respondent
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORT SOUTH ZONE
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court