K.a.Mohammed v. Thrissur Municipal Corporation
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala, on the admission date of May 9, 2023, observed that due amounts were paid to the petitioners and allowed no other consideration. These connected writ petitions were subsequently closed as having become infructuous without further reasoning.
What did the court decide?
No other relief to consider; writs closed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 19TH JYAISHTA, 1945
WP(C) NO.2286 OF 2018
PETITIONER :-
RAPPAI.K.L., AGED 64 YEARS S/O.LONAPPAN, KALAPPURA HOUSE, KALLUR P.O., THRISSUR TALUK.
BY ADVS. SMT.MINI GANGADHARAN SRI.N.C.SAJUNAM
RESPONDENTS :-
1 THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPROATION REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION OF THRISSUR, THRISSUR – 680 001.
2 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER/CORPORATION ENGINEER THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION OF THRISSUR, THRISSUR – 680 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rappaik (Petitioner in WP(C) No.2286 of 2018); Rappaik (Petitioner in WP(C) No.2346 of 2018); M. Ramachandran (Petitioner in WP(C) No.2358 of 2018); K. Mohammed
- respondent
Trissur Municipal Corporation
Coram
Anu Sivaraman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court