This writ petition sought a direction to the Kerala Regional Transport Authority to consider a request by the petitioner for revising the timings of her operating stage carriage. The Court directed the respondent to consider the pending request within two months.
The respondent was directed to consider the pending request for revision of timings within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1945
WP(C) NO.22637 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
SAINABA, AGED 65 YEARS
W/O.KUNJU MARAKKAR (LATE)
PALAPPURATH HOUSE, KUMBALANGI,
PALLURUTHY P.O.,KOCHI-, PIN – 682006
BY ADV.PRASAD CHANDRAN
RESPONDENT:
THE SECRETARY
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER
CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, PIN – 682030
BY SMT.PARVATHY, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 02.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
2
W.P(C) No.22637 of 2023
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking a direction
to the respondent to consider Ext.P4 request for
revision of timings of the petitioner's own service
operating on the route North Paravoor-Vyttila Hub in
respect of stage carriage KL-07-BF-4343 within a time
frame.
2. The petitioner’s case is that even though she
had submitted Ext.P4 request on 21.06.2023 to revise
the timings of the above vehicle, the same has not
been considered. Hence, this writ petition.
3. Heard Sri.Prasad Chandran, learned counsel for
the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader
appearing for the respondent.
4. Having considered the pleadings and materials
and taking note of the submissions of the petitioner
that Ext.P4 is pending consideration before the
respondent, there will be a direction to the
W.P(C) No.22637 of 20233
respondent to consider the same in accordance with law
and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within
a period of two months from the date of receipt of a
certified copy of this judgment, subject to the
priority of pending applications as directed to be
considered by this Court and after hearing the
petitioner and other affected parties, if any.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE
sp/02/08/2023
W.P(C) No.22637 of 20234
APPENDIX
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS :-
EXHIBITP1 |
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO11231/2022 DATED 08.04.2022 |
|---|---|
EXHIBITP2 |
A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN MVARPNO.68/2022 DATED 18.07.2022 |
EXHIBITP3 |
A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THERESPONDENT DATED 23.08.2022 |
EXHIBITP4 |
A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FOR REVISION OFTIMINGS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORETHE RESPONDENT DATED 21.06.2023 |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent should consider the petitioner's request for revision of timings of a stage carriage within a specified time frame.
SAINABA
THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court