Grace Rony, v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on account of the efflux of time. Any interim order granted stands vacated.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 23TH BHADRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 21103 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:
GRACE RONY,
AGED 65 YEARS
W/O RONY PHILIP (LATE), MANALEL HOUSE, PUTHUPPALLY P.O.
KOTTAYAM-, PIN - 686011
BY ADV NAZRIN BANU
RESPONDENT/S:
THE SECRETARY,
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI, OFFICE OF THE
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, IDUKKI, PIN
- 685603
S. GOPINATH-SR.GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Grace Rony
- respondent
The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Idukki
Coram
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court