Rafeena v. Vs State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of a writ petition at the admission stage, directing the State to expeditiously consider a fresh representation regarding the petitioner's appointment, citing prior precedent.
What did the court decide?
Direct the 1st respondent to consider Ext. P9 in light of Exts. P7 & P8 and Nadeera v. State of Kerala, passing orders within four months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
WEDNESDAY, THE 18THDAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 28TH POUSHA,1944
WP(C) NO. 1702 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:
RAFEENA V
AGED 37 YEARS
H.S.T (MATHS),
SIR SYED HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,
KARIMBAM PO, TALIPARAMBA
KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670141
BY ADV POOVAMULLE PARAMBIL ABDUL KAREEM
RESPONDENT/S:
1STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
2 DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION
JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695014., PIN - 695014
3 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KANNUR-670001., PIN - 670001
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the State government should reconsider the petitioner's appointment and representation in light of the principles laid down in Nadeera v. State of Kerala.
Whether the pending orders quashing the petitioner's appointment should be quashed to restore her entitlement to the post and consequential benefits.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAFEENA
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION
- respondent
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
- respondent
DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court