George Mathew v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment disposed of five connected writ petitions filed by contractors against the Kerala Water Authority. The Court set aside a Circular dated 16.11.2022 which imposed a 10% retention requirement on pending works, holding that such additional conditions cannot be unilaterally imposed after contracts have been executed.
What did the court decide?
The impugned Circular dated 16.11.2022 is set aside against the petitioners and the specific works. Liberty granted to the Kerala Water Authority to negotiate or invoke other legal remedies.