Parvathy K, v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed a writ petition as infructuous without addressing any substantive legal or factual issues, noting pending interlocutory applications.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; pending interlocutory applications stand dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH
WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 3RD KARTHIKA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 15641 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:
PARVATHY K, AGED 56 YEARS W/O MURALIDHARAN, VARIYANGATTIL HOUSE, THAYYUR P.O, VIA ERUMAPETTI, THRISSUR-680584
BY ADVS. P.DEEPAK NAZRIN BANU
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, MALAPPURAM-676505
2 THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, VATAKARA- 673104
3 SUBRAMANI, S/O RAMASWAMY, KOLLASSERY PARAMBU HOUSE, KALLAI P.O, KOZHIKODE -673003 4 K.K. UDAYAN, S/O KOCHUNNI, KODAPAADATH HOUSE, AYAMUCK, CHIRANELLUR, THRISSUR -680501 BY ADV SAJU J.VALLYARA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parvathy K
- respondent
The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram
- respondent
The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Vatakara
- respondent
Subramani
- respondent
K.K. Udayan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court