Dismissed
K.K. Akbar v. the Secretary
Kerala HCWP(C)/15389/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission. No substantive legal issues were addressed or merits examined.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
¶4
TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 13TH POUSHA, 1944
¶5
WP(C) NO. 15389 OF 2018
¶6
PETITIONER:
¶7
K.K. AKBAR AGED 40 YEARS S/O. KUNJUMOHAMMED, KALAPPURACKAL VEEDU, THRIKKAKKARA P. O., PIN – 682 021.
¶8
BY ADVS. SRI. A.B.JALEEL SRI. A.J.SHAHEER
¶9
RESPONDENTS:
¶10
- 1 THE SECRETARY MUVATTUPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA - 686 673.
¶11
- 2 ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER LSGD, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA - 686 673.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
K.K. Akbar
- respondent
The Secretary Muvattupuzha Municipality
- respondent
Eliyass
- respondent
Mini Eliyas
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court