Maruvan v. 1) Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged a notice for taking possession of a vehicle loan. Court noted petitioner failed to comply with prior order allowing installment repayment. Dismissed petition citing Supreme Court guidance against writ interference in SFA matters absent extraordinary circumstances.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 12999 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
MARUVAN
AGED 32 YEARS, S/O MOIDEEN,
PUTHANCHIRAKUNNIL NOOLPUZHA
WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN - 673592
BY ADVS.
CHERIAN MATHEW POOTHICOTE
AJITH VILLY GEORGE
GEORGE G.POOTHICOTE
RESPONDENT:
BANK OF BARODA
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER ,
MIDHUN, T K H ARCADE, CHUNGAM ,
SULTHAN BATHERY , WAYANAD ,
SULTAN BATHERY, PIN - 673592
BY ADV K.ANAND, [SC, BANK OF BARODA]
SRI. LEO GEORGE
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere in proceedings under SFA 2002 despite non-compliance by the borrower with earlier directions granted in this Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MARUVAN
- respondent
BANK OF BARODA
Coram
C.S. DIAS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court