K.N.Shahul Hameed, v. the State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
On 06.07.2023, the Kerala High Court closed Writ Petition (C) No. 12275 of 2019 as infructuous, accepting the petitioner's counsel's submission that the full amount had been deposited with the 3rd respondent, leaving nothing for legal consideration.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is closed as having become infructuous.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 15TH ASHADHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 12275 OF 2019
PETITIONER:
K.N.SHAHUL HAMEED,
AGED 63 YEARS
RESIDING AT SUMMAYYA MANZIL, VADAKKEMAILEKATTU,
KANNANALOOR P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV S.SREEKUMAR (KOLLAM)
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF THE PANCHAYAT, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM - 691 013.
3THE SECRETARY,
THRIKOVILVATTOM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, MUKHATHALA P.O.,
KOLLAM - 691 577.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition became infructuous as the entire amount was deposited before the 3rd respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.N. Shahul Hameed
- respondent
The State of Kerala
- respondent
Deputy Director of Panchayat
- respondent
Secretary, Thrikovilivattom Grama Panchayat
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court