Joby George, v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 11953 of 2023 on the merits as not pressed, where the petitioner failed to pursue the matter after the filing of the petition.
The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 11953 of 2023 on the merits as not pressed, where the petitioner failed to pursue the matter after the filing of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 15TH KARTHIKA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 11953 OF 2023
PETITIONERS:
1 JOBY GEORGE, AGED 53 YEARS S/O. P.S.GEORGE, PUNNAKKUDIYIL NORTH JANATHA ROAD PALARIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY SOUTH, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 6820252 JOYAL JOBY GEORGE,AGED 29 YEARS S/O. JOBY GEORGE, PUNNAKKUDIYIL NORTH JANATHA ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY SOUTH, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682025BY ADV K.J.MANU RAJ
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 6950012 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,FORTKOCHI, X69V+2HV, FIRST FLOOR, K.B JACOB ROAD,
FORTKOCHI, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682001
3 THE TAHSILDAR, KOCHI TALUK,1ST FLOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 6820114 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PUTHUVYPE VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 6825085 AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, CONVENER OF LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, ELAMKUNNAPUZHA KRISHI BHAVAN, MALIPPURAM P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682511OTHER PRESENT:
GP - RIYAL DEVASSY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06.11.2023,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.11953 of 2023
2
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
W.P (C) No.11953 of 2023
................................................................. Dated this the 6th day of November, 2023
JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition is not pressed.
Submission recorded and the Writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM
JUDGE
cks
WP(C) No.11953 of 2023
3
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11953/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit |
P 1 |
A TRUE COPY OF THE PURCHASE CERTIFICATE |
|---|---|---|
DATED 13.12.1977 IN OA 1931/77 OF LANDTRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM |
||
Exhibit |
P 1 |
[ a ]A TRUE COPY OF THE PURCHASE CERTIFICATEDATED 13.12.1977 IN OA 2055/77 OF LANDTRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM |
Exhibit |
P 1 |
[ b ]A TRUE COPY OF THE PURCHASE CERTIFICATEDATED 13.12.1977 IN OS NO.2054/77 OFLAND TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM |
Exhibit |
P 2 |
A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGESETTLEMENT REGISTER ISSUED BY THEVILLAGE OFFICER , ELANKUNNAPUZHA |
Exhibit |
P 3 |
A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OFTHE BASIC TAX REGISTER OF THEPETITIONER'S PROPERTY ISSUED BY THEVILLAGE OFFICER. PUTHUVYPPU |
Exhibit |
P 4 |
A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OFTHE BASIC TAX REGISTER IN FROM F |
Exhibit |
P 5 |
A TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPTDATED 14.2.2023 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGEOFFICER PUTHUVYPPU TO THE 1STPETITIONER |
Exhibit |
P 5 |
[ a ]A TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUEDTO THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 14.2.2023BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER |
Exhibit |
P 6 |
A TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSIONCERTIFICATE DATED 11.8.2021 ISSUED BYTHE VILLAGE OFFICER PUTHUVYPPU TO THE1ST PETITIONER |
Exhibit |
P 6 |
[ a ]A TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSIONCERTIFICATE DATED 10.8.2021 ISSUED BYTHE VILLAGE OFFICER PUTHUVYPPU TO THE1ST PETITIONER |
Exhibit |
P 6 |
[ b ]A TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION |
WP(C) No.11953 of 2023
4
CERTIFICATE DATED 21.7.2021 ISSUED BY
THE VILLAGE OFFICER PUTHUVYPPU TO THE
2ND PETITIONER
Exhibit1 |
P 6 |
[ c ] A TRUE COPY OF THECERTIFICATE DATED 2THE VILLAGE OFFICER2ND PETITIONER |
POSSESSION1.7.2021 ISSUED BYPUTHUVYPPU TO THE |
|---|---|---|---|
Exhibit1 |
P 6 |
[ d ] A TRUE COPY OF THELETTER DATED 4.8.19RESPONDENT |
RELEVANT PAGE OF98 OF THE 3RD |
Exhibit1 |
P 7 |
A TRUE COPY OF THEIN TERMS OF RULE 9ASSIGNMENT RULES 19 |
FORM OF PATTA ISSUEDOF KERALA LAND64 DATED 3.4.1979 |
Exhibit1 |
P 8 |
A TRUE COPY OF THEIN TERMS OF RULE 9ASSIGNMENT RULES 19 |
FORM OF PATTA ISSUEDOF KERALA LAND64 DATED 25.4.1979 |
Exhibit |
P 9 |
A TRUE COPY OF THELOCAL LEVEL MONITORNIL |
DECISION OF THEING COMMITTEE DATED |
Exhibit1 |
P 9 |
[ a ] A TRUE COPY OF THEAGRICULTURAL OFFICE |
REPORT OFR |
Exhibit1 |
P 10 |
A TRUE COPY OF THETHE REPORT OF THE KSENSING AND ENVIRONNIL |
RELEVANT PAGES OFERALA STATE REMOTEMENT CENTER DATED |
Exhibit |
P 11 |
A TRUE COPY OF THEOF THE 1ST RESPONDE |
FROM 5 APPLICATIONNT DATED 23.2.2023 |
Exhibit |
P 11 |
[a ]A TRUE COPY OF THEDATED 23.2.2023 OF |
RECEIPT OF FORM 5THE 1ST PETITIONER |
Exhibit |
P 12 |
A TRUE COPY OF THEOF THE 2ND PETITIONTHE 2ND RESPONDENT |
FORM 5 APPLICATIONER SUBMITTED BEFORE23.2.2023 |
Exhibit |
P 12 |
[a ]A TRUE COPY OF THEDATED 23.2.2023 OF |
RECEIPT OF FORM 5THE 2ND PETITIONER |
JOBY GEORGE
JOYAL JOBY GEORGE
STATE OF KERALA
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
THE TAHSILDAR
THE VILLAGE OFFICER
VIJU ABRAHAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court