Dhanalakshmi v. Sreedharan
Kerala HCTr.P(C)/102/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single judge permitted withdrawal of a civil transfer petition, dismissing it as not pressed.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JULY 2023 / 12TH ASHADHA, 1945
TR.P(C) NO. 102 OF 2023
O.P.NO.336/2020 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD
¶4
PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT:
¶5
DHANALAKSHMI,
AGED 52 YEARS,
D/O BALAN ACHARI,
PATHIRAKKATTIL HOUSE,
NALLUR, KARUVANTHURUTHI,
FEROKE, KOZHIKODE – 673 631
¶6
BY ADVS.
R.SUDHISH
M.MANJU
¶7
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
¶8
SREEDHARAN,
AGED 64 YEARS,
S/O KUNJUNNI,
SANTHI SADHAN,
VADAKANTHARA VILLAGE,
RAM NAGAR, PALAKKAD- 678 508
BY ADV V.A.Johnson (Varikkappallil) V A
¶9
THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
¶10
TR.P(C) NO. 102 OF 2023
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Dhanalakshmi
- respondent
Sreedharan
Coram
AI extract
P. Somarajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court