Dismissed
Sauri v. Ammukutty Amma
Kerala HCSA/811/2002
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed a second appeal as not pressed on the day of hearing because the appellants filed a memo stating they did not want to proceed with the appeal.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
¶4
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945
¶5
SA NO. 811 OF 2002
¶6
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 19/1997 OF THE PRINCIPAL SUB
¶7
COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
¶8
ARISING FROM THE JUDGMENT IN O.S.NO.53/1995 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKKUDA
¶9
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
¶10
1 SAURI, S/O.KEETTIKKAL ANTHONY KARALAM VILLAGE, DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
¶11
2 KOCHUOUSEPH, S/O.SAURI -DO- -DO-.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
SAURI, S/O.KEETTIKKAL ANTHONY KARALAM
- appellant
KOCHUOUSEPH
- appellant
ANTHONY
- appellant
YOHANNAN
- respondent
AMMUKUTTY AMMA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court