Dismissed
Parameswaran v. Kumaran Nair
Kerala HCRSA/139/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This regular second appeal was dismissed as abated because no steps were taken to implead the legal heirs, as earlier directed by the court.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of the regular second appeal as abated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
¶4
FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945
¶5
RSA NO. 139 OF 2015
¶6
AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.4071/2011 IN AS.NO.378/2011 OF ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT COURT IV, THRISSUR AND AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN
¶7
O.S.NO.637/2005 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, THRISSUR
¶8
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/11TH DEFENDANT:
¶9
PARAMESWARAN
¶10
S/O.NAGELIVALAPPIL VELAKKATHARA KAMALAKSHI AMMA, CHERUR
DESOM, VILVATTOM VILLAGE, THRISSUR.
¶11
BY ADV SRI.DILIP J. AKKARA
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
PARAMESWARAN
- respondent
KUMARAN NAIR
- respondent
KOCHAMMINI AMMA
- respondent
PANKAJAKSHI AMMA
- respondent
RADHAKRISHNAN @ BABY
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court