Joby K.Baby v. Rency
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1945
RPFC NO. 48 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTMC 37/2016 OF FAMILY COURT, PALA
REVISION PETITIONER/S:
JOBY K.BABY
AGED 37 YEARS
S/O.BABY, KORAMKUZHACKAL HOUSE, MANNACHANAD P.O., KURICHITHANAM
KARA, KURICHITHANAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,
PIN-686 633.
BY ADV P.C.HARIDAS
RESPONDENT/S:
1RENCY
AGED 34 YEARS
THENGUMPALLIL HOUSE, ANAKKARA P.O., CHAKKUPALLOM VILLAGE,
UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685 512.
2DIYA (MINOR)
AGED 5 YEARS
C/O.RENCY THENGUMPALLIL HOUSE, ANAKKARA P.O., CHAKKUPALLOM
VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685 512,
REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN RENCY.P.J., D/O.YOHANNAN, AGED
34 YEARS, THENGUMPALLIL HOUSE, ANAKKARA P.O., CHAKKUPALLOM
VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685 512.
THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 03.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME
DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RP (FC) No. 48 of 2021
..2..
O R D E R
Dated this the 03rd day of August, 2023
The learned counsel for the revision petitioner would
submit that the maintenance dispute has been settled in between the parties and therefore, the revision petitioner is not interested to proceed with this Revision Petition (FC).
In view of the above submission, this Revision Petition (FC) dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE
RMV
TRUE COPY
P.A.TO JUDGE
JOBY K.BABY
RENCY
DIYA
A. BADHARUDEEN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court