Abdul Sathar v. Jasmine
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition challenging Family Court order granting wife monthly maintenance of Rs.4000/- due to divorce. High Court found no error, dismissed petition, and allowed petitioner two instalments to clear arrears.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed; parties granted breathing time to pay arrears in two installments by 1.1.2024 and 1.2.2024.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1945
RPFC NO. 157 OF 2016
AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC 55/2013 OF FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
ABDUL SATHAR
S/O. MUHAMMADALI HAJI, PUTHUVEETTIL HOUSE, PATTIKKARA,
KECHERY, CHIRANELLUR.
BY ADV SRI.AVM.SALAHUDIN
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
JASMINE
D/O. VALIYAKATHU VEETTIL MOIDU, MANDALAMKUNNU DESOM,
PUNNAYUR VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK- 679 562.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether there is any illegality, irregularity or impropriety in the Family Court's order fixing a monthly maintenance allowance of Rs.4000/-.
Whether the quantum of maintenance fixed by the Family Court is reasonable given the circumstances.
Whether the revision petition deserves to be allowed to interfere with the maintenance order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ABDUL SATHAR
- respondent
JASMINE
Coram
C.S.DIAS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court