Allowed

Mariyam Rasheed v. the District Collector

Kerala HC7 Jun 2023RP/383/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this review petition, the single judge recalled and reviewed the judgment in WP(C) 33535/2022 dated 3.3.2023, allowing the same to be posted for admission post the Writ Petition as per roster following submissions on unavoidable absence.

What did the court decide?

The judgment dated 3.3.2023 was reviewed and recalled, with the matter posted to the roster post the Writ Petition for admission.

Mariyam Rasheed Vs the District Collector — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 7^TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 17TH JYAISHTA, 1945

¶5

RP NO.383 OF 2023

¶6

JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 33535/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 3.3.2023

¶7

REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER :-

¶8

MARIYAM RASHEED, AGED 62 YEARS D/O.ABDUL RASHEED, ALFANATH HOUSE, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 017.

¶9

BY ADV V.A.VINOD

¶10

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS :-

¶11

1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

¶12

CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 021.

¶13

2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, K B JACOB ROAD, FORT KOCHI, PIN – 682 001.

¶14

3 THE TAHSILDAR PARAVUR TALUK OFFICE, PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 683 513.

¶15

4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER

¶16

PUTHENVELIKKARA VILLAGE OFFICE, PUTHENVELIKKARA, PARAVUR, PIN – 682 493.

¶17

5 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER KUNNUKARA KRISHI BHAVAN, KUNNUKARA, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 683 578.

¶18

6 THE DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE REMOTE SENSING AND ENVIRONMENT CENTRE VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 033 BY SRI.APPU P.S., GP BY SRI.VISHNU S. CHEMPAZHANTHIYIL

¶19

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

RP NO.383 OF 2023

-: 2 :-

O R D E R

Dated this the 7th day of June, 2023

¶24

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the review petitioner that the counsel was unable to attend the court at the relevant time only due to unavoidable circumstances and that therefore, the contentions could not be properly considered.

¶25

Having heard the learned Government Pleader also and in view of the submissions made, the judgment dated 3.3.2023 is reviewed and recalled. Post the Writ Petition for admission as per roster.

¶26

Sd/ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE

Jvt

RP NO.383 OF 2023

-: 3 :-

APPENDIX OF RP 383/2023

¶31

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

¶32

Annexure1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 14250/2022 DATED 22.4.2022 Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER DATED 19.4.2021

Mariyam Rasheed v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mariyam Rasheed v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Sreedharan Namboothiri, Vs the District Collector

K. Lekshmy, Vs Smt. A.G Oleena

Varkey Madakampurath Vs the Secretary

Reserve Bank of India Vs Meenakshi P.R

N.R. Gopalakrishnan Pillai Vs State of Kerala

M/S K.H. Floorings Vs Sales Tax Inspector