Dismissed
V.M.Abdhul Samad, v. Kochu Thresia
Kerala HCRFA/335/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as appellant's counsel had no instructions from the party; pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
¶4
TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 23RD JYAISHTA, 1945
¶5
RFA NO. 335 OF 2022
¶6
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30-07-2019 IN OS
85/2012 OF SUB COURT, CHERTHALA.
¶7
APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
¶8
1 V.M.ABDHUL SAMAD, S/O. MUHAMMED, VALIYAVEED, CC NO. 11/148A, THAMARAKULAM ROAD, FORT KOCHI P.O. AMARAVATHI DESOM, FORT KOCHI VILLAGE,
¶9
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT – 682 001.
¶10
2 K.M. ABDHUL AZES, S/O. K.M. MUHAMMED, KURUPPAMVEEDU, CC NO. 16/833, THOPPUMPADY P.O., RAMESWARAM PADINJARE MURI, THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT – 682 005.
¶11
3 K.I. NAZER, S/O. IBRAHIM, KARAYIL, CC 16/1938 C, AISWARYA NAGAR, THOPPUMPADY P.O., PALLURUTHY MURI, RAMESWARAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT – 682 005. BY ADVS.C.P.SAJI & RIJO DOMY
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
V.M.ABDHUL SAMAD, K.M. ABDHUL AZES, K.I. NAZER
- respondent
KOCHU THRESIA
Coram
AI extract
Sathish Ninan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court