Dismissed
Minikumari v. Prasannakumari
Kerala HCRFA/177/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The regular first appeal was admitted on 20-01-2023. The appeal was rejected for non-payment of the balance court fee, and all pending interlocutory applications were closed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal rejected for non-payment of balance court fee; pending interlocutory applications closed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT
¶2
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
¶3
THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 18TH JYAISHTA, 1945
RFA NO. 177 OF 2022
¶4
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26-8-2021 IN OS 262/2010
OF SUB COURT, NEYYATTINKARA.
¶5
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT :
¶6
MINIKUMARI, D/O. SANTHAMMA, AGED 35 YEARS,
AAYAMVILAKATHU HOUSE, CHENKAL, ARAYOOR,
NEYYATTINKARA, MARIYAPURAM P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 127.
BY ADV LIJU. M.P
¶7
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF :
¶8
PRASANNAKUMARI, D/O.LOUIS,AGED 58 YEARS
V.P.VILLA, THIRUPURAM P.O., PUTHENKADA,
NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 133
¶9
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
08.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
¶10
Sathish Ninan, J. ==============================
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Minikumari, D/o. Santhamma
- respondent
Prasannakumari, D/o. Louis
Coram
AI extract
Sathish Ninan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court