Vinod .S v. Lakshmi.S
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition under Article 227 seeking supervisory jurisdiction to compel the Family Court to decide a nullity petition was dismissed because the Family Court had already passed orders on the underlying application.
What did the court decide?
The Original Petition was dismissed without any direction to the Family Court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 24TH MAGHA, 1944
OP (FC) NO. 67 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTOP 700/2020 OF FAMILY COURT,TRIVANDRUM
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
VINOD .S.,
AGED 35 YEARS,
S/O LATE SUGUNA SEKHARAPILLAI G, BHAVAYAMI,
T.C NO.4/1971 (3), NEAR BHARATHIYA VIDYA BHAVAN,
PANGAPPARA P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695581
BY ADV S.S.ARAVIND
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
LAKSHMI.S.,
AGED 30 YEARS,
D/O SHANTHAKUMARI.S. LAKSHMI, SET-204, CHALAKUZHY ROAD,
PATTOM. P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695004
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition should be dismissed given that the Family Court had already afforded a hearing on the underlying petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinod .S.
- respondent
Lakshmi.S.
Coram
Anil K. Narendran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court