Megha v. V.G. Rajesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner wife invoked Article 227 jurisdiction seeking modification of earlier judgment, apprehending Family Court would not entertain it. Court noted it had previously granted liberty to move to FC for modification. Dismissed petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition is disposed of holding that the party can move the Family Court for modification as per existing conditions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 24TH KARTHIKA,
1945
OP (FC) NO. 466 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.1013/2014 DATED 19/09/2018 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:-
MEGHA, AGED 36 YEARS, D/O. PACHERI CHANDRAN, MANAVALASSERI VILLAGE, KOMBARA DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER CHANDRAN P.K., AGED 72 YEARS, S/O. KUTTAPPAN, PANCHERY HOUSE, P.O.EAST KOMBARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN – 680 121.
BY ADVS. DHANYA P.ASHOKAN S. MUHAMMAD ALIKHAN M.R.VENUGOPAL SREEDARSHAN SUDHAKARAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can invoke jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for modification of family court orders when the High Court itself has expressly granted liberty to approa
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MEGHA
- respondent
V.G. RAJESH
Coram
AMIT RAWAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court