Reney Varghese v. Kamala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the Family Court, Vadakara, to pass orders on the pending objection filed by the petitioner within four weeks before the interim restriction on alienating property is revoked.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Family Court to pass orders after considering the pending objection within four weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1945 OP (FC) NO. 374 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER IN EA NO.65/2021 IN EP NO.22 OF 2021 IN OP
201/2017 OF FAMILY COURT, VADAKARA
PETITIONER:
RENEY VARGHESE
AGED 50 YEARS
S/O K. I. VARGHESE, KONNAYIL (H), CHEEKANAL MURI,
OMALLUR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA -, PIN - 689647
BY ADVS.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the Family Court to pass orders on the pending objection filed by the petitioner against the interim restriction.
Whether the pending objection should be considered before finally disposing of the petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Reny Varghese
- respondent
Kamala
- respondent
Sasi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court