Sulfikkar K. v. Vs Nijina
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court, despite being approached via Article 227 to challenge a Family Court order on child custody, declined to interfere. It directed the mother to produce the child before the Family Court to facilitate an appropriate decision.
What did the court decide?
The 1st petitioner was directed to produce the minor child before the Family Court on 20.01.2023; the petition was disposed of without interfering with the Family Court order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023/27TH POUSHA, 1944
OP (FC) NO. 23 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 23.12.2022 IN I.A.NO.7 OF 2022 IN
GOP NO.1249 OF 2021 OF THE FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR
PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS:
1 SULFIKKAR K. V, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O SUBAIR, KODUNGUKKARAN HOUSE, CHENTHRAPPINNY VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680687
2 SULTHAN SAMEEN, AGED 6 YEARS, S/O SULFIKKAR. K.V, KODUNGUKKARAN HOUSE, CHENTHRAPPINNY VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT – 680 687, REPRESENTED BY 1ST PETITIONER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Family Court order regarding minor custody under Article 227 relief
Whether the petitioners are hearing the minor child produced before the Family Court
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SULFIKKAR K. V
- petitioner
SULTHAN SAMEEN
- respondent
NIJINA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court