A.O.Vincent v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioners challenged the recruitment/parity in pay in the Postal Department. The court held that an office memorandum issued by the Government on 28.09.2018 resolved the issues, making the petitions superfluous.
What did the court decide?
The petitions were declared closed as the underlying issues were resolved by an office memorandum issued by the Union Government.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 10TH KARTHIKA, 1945
OP (CAT) NO. 255 OF 2016
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA 163/2013 OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH
PETITIONER/S:
1A.O.VINCENT
AGED 46 YEARS
S/O. OUSEPH, POSTAL ASSISTANT, AMMADAM, THRISSUR
DIVISION, RESIDING AT AKKARA HOUSE, VEGNISSERY, PARLAM
P.O.-680563.
2 PREMANADHAN K.
AGED 50 YEARS
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the issues between the parties regarding parity in pay in the Postal Department have been resolved.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.O. VINCENT
- petitioner
PREMANADHAN K.
- petitioner
N. SURESH KUMAR
- petitioner
SHIBI IMMANUEL
- petitioner
K S SAJEEV
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court