Nabeesa Beevi v. Aravind
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the Munsiff to hear and dispose of an interlocutory application regarding the remittal of a Commissioner's report before proceeding with the trial, without expressing an opinion on the merits.
What did the court decide?
Directed the learned Munsiff to hear and dispose of I.A.No.2/2022 before the commencement of the trial.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 26TH KARTHIKA, 1945
OP(C) NO. 320 OF 2022
AGAINST ORDER DTD.11.1.2022 IN I.A.No.2/2022 IN OS 534/2015 & ORDER DTD.25.1.2022 IN I.A.No.3/2022 IN OS 534/2015 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PUNALUR
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS:
1 NABEESA BEEVI AGED 75 YEARS W/O. S.M.SHEREEF, SHEREEF GARDEN, THUMPODU, NELLIPALLY, VALACODE VILLAGE, PUNALUR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691331.
2 NASEEMA SHEREEF, AGED 55 YEARS D/O. NABEESA BEEVI, SHEREEF GARDEN, THUMPODU, NELLIPALLY, VALACODE VILLAGE, PUNALUR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691331.
BY ADVS. SUBHASH CYRIAC S.SREEJITH ASHA JYOTHY
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interlocutory application No.2/2022 seeking to remit the Commissioner's report requires consideration before the commencement of the trial.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
NABEESA BEEVI AGED 75 YEARS W/O. S.M.SHEREEF
- petitioner
NASEEMA SHEREEF AGED 55 YEARS D/O. NABEESA BEEVI
- respondent
ARAVIND
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court