Paul Mathew v. Gandhigram Agro Based Industrial Co-Operative Society
Case brief
What is this about?
, multiple decree holders challenged the dismissal of their prayer for rateable distribution of sale proceeds from a judgment debtor's property. The High Court found the lower court's reasoning perverse, emphasizing that Section 73 CPC mandates equitable distribution. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration. (58 words) and:
What did the court decide?
The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the trial court for fresh consideration of the prayer for rateable distribution.