Sudharma.T v. Vijayan
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 13TH BHADRA, 1945
OP(C) NO. 1717 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT OS 145/2022 OF MUNSIFF COURT,CHENGANNUR
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:
SUDHARMA.T., AGED 47 YEARS, W/O AJIKUMAR, RESIDING AT THEKKEPURAYIL VANEERAYYATHU VEEDU THEKKE MURI, SOORANDAUNORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHUR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690561
ARUN.B.VARGHESE RAKHI RAJ
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
VIJAYAN, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O AMMINI, PUTHEN VILAYIL VEEDU VENMANI ERAM, VENMANI VILLAGE CHENGANNOOR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 689509
VINOD KUMAR POOVATHUMMOOTTIL PARVATHI VENUGOPAL(K/1331/1998)
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP(C) NO. 1717 OF 2023
2
JUDGMENT
When this matter was called today, Smt.Haritha Haridas – learned counsel for the respondent, submitted that she does not oppose the first prayer sought for by the petitioner in this case.
In the afore circumstances, I direct the Munsiff Court, Chengannoor to take up Exts.P2, P3 and P4 applications stated to be pending in O.S.No.145/2022 and dispose it of, after affording necessary opportunities to both sides, as expeditiously as is possible, but not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
I clarify that I have not entered into the merits of any of the rival contentions and that it is up to the learned Trial Court to deal with and decide them as per law.
Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
stu
OP(C) NO. 1717 OF 2023
3
APPENDIX OF OP(C) 1717/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
| Exhibit P1 | A TRUE COPY OF THE 145/2022 PENDING ON COURT CHENGANOOR |
PLAINT IN O.S NO: THE FILES OF MUNSIFF |
|---|---|---|
| Exhibit P2 | A TRUE COPY OF I.A 145/2022 PENDING ON COURT CHENGANOOR |
NO: 1/2022 IN O.S NO: THE FILES OF MUNSIFF |
| Exhibit P3 | A TRUE COPY OF I.A 145/2022 PENDING ON COURT CHENGANOOR |
NO: 2/2022 IN O.S NO: THE FILES OF MUNSIFF |
| Exhibit P4 | A TRUE COPY OF I.A 145/2022 PENDING ON COURT CHENGANOOR |
NO: 3/2022 IN O.S NO: THE FILES OF MUNSIFF |
| Exhibit P5 | A TRUE COPY OF THE IN THE OFFICIAL WEB COURT CHENGANOOR |
CASE STATUS AVAILABLE SITE OF THE MUNSIFF |
Sudharma.T.
Vijayan
Devan Ramachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court