Davis v. Raghavan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the petition to remit a Commissioner's report in a property dispute, acknowledging the report's failure to fix the disputed boundary. The Munsiff was directed to expedite a proper report. The suit must be disposed within six months of the new report. Thin order.
What did the court decide?
Allowed application to remit the Commissioner's report; directed Munsiff to issue necessary directions and dispose of suit within six months of receipt of proper report.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1945
OP(C) NO. 1289 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT OS 4403/2022 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT
,IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER/DEFENDANT:
DAVIS
AGED 59 YEARS S/O KURIYAPILLY JOSEPH ,KIZHAKKEPURAM DESOM ,KOTTUVALLY VILLAGE , PARAVOOR, PIN - 683513 BY ADV G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
- 1 RAGHAVAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Commissioner's report suffered fatal infirmity due to failure to fix the disputed western boundary.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Davis
- respondent
Raghavan
- respondent
Harish
- respondent
Suresh
- respondent
M. K. Leelavathy
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court