In this miscellaneous jurisdiction case, the court closed the matter without prejudice to the right of parties to file an application for restoration, as no instructions were received and reliefs were unlikely to survive.
MJC closed without prejudice to the right to file an application for restoration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 9TH CHAITHRA, 1945 MJC NO. 274 OF 2000
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTOP 9877/1990 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
ITTIARICHA KURUP BY ADVS. SRI.A.C.JOSE SRI.C.A.MAJEED
RESPONDENT/S:
K.S.D.P.LTD
THIS MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
:2:
MJC NO. 274 OF 2000
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. J.
…......................................................
MJC No. 274 of 2000
….........................................................
Dated this the 30 th day of March, 2023
ORDER
Learned counsel for the parties submit that they do not have any instructions in the matter. At this distance of time, there is no likelihood of the reliefs sought in the above case surviving. Accordingly, the MJC is closed without prejudice to the right of the parties to file an application seeking restoration, if there is anything surviving for consideration on the basis of the cause of action urged in the above case.
Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS. C.P., JUDGE.
Ani/30/3/2023
/true copy/
ITTARIKHA KURUP
K.S.D.P.LTD
MOHAMMED NIAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
