Matrimonial appeal against divorce decree dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant after settlement in mediation.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G.AJITHKUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 23RD POUSHA,
1944
MAT.APPEAL NO.838OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.08.2022 IN
O.P.(DIV)NO.325 OF 2019 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY
COURT, THIRUVALLA
APPELLANT:
SHILU THOMAS,
AGED 34 YEARS,
S/O. THOMAS VARKEY, KIZHAKKENATH HOUSE,
PANDANADU NORTH P.O., PANDANADU VILLAGE,
CHENGANNUR TALUK, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-689
124
BY ADV K.RAJESH KANNAN
RESPONDENT:
DINCY ANNIE RAJU,
AGED 27 YEARS,
D/O. RAJU THOMAS, THALASSERIL VEEDU, EAST
OTHERA P.O., EAST OTHERA MURI, ERAVIPEROOR
VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, PATTANAMTHITTA
DISTRICT, PIN-689 546
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 13.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
2
Mat. Appeal No.838 of 2022
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The appellant is the respondent in O.P.(Divorce)No.325 of 2019 on the file of the Family Court, Thiruvalla, which is one filed by the respondent herein, seeking dissolution of the marriage solemnised between the parties 29.12.2018 as per the custom and practice prevailing in Christian community. By the judgment and decree dated 17.08.2022, the Family Court, allowed O.P.(Divorce) No.325 of 2019 and granted a decree dissolving the marriage solemnised between the parties on 29.12.2018, from the date of decree with costs of the proceedings. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant filed this appeal, invoking the provisions under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, along with C.M. Application No.1 of 2022 for condonation of delay of 54 days.
3
Mat. Appeal No.838 of 2022
submit that the parties have settled the disputes in mediation and in such circumstances, the appellant do not want to prosecute this appeal.
In such circumstances, recording the above submissions
made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE
Sd/-
P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE
MIN
SHILU THOMAS
DINCY ANNIE RAJU
ANIL K. NARENDRAN
P.G. AJITHKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court