Azad P. v. Aji
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against a matrimonial decree was dismissed because the appellants successfully argued that the entire decree amount had already been satisfied by the respondent.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed on the ground that the entire decree amount was satisfied and the appeal was not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 30TH JYAISHTA, 1945
MAT.APPEAL NO.545 OF 2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 06.05.2016 IN O.P.NO.325/2014 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS IN O.P.:
1 AZAD P., AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, PAZHAYAKADU VEEDU, POTHAPPALLY NORTH, KUMARAPURAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
2 SATHIYAMMA, PAZHAYAKADU VEEDU, POTHAPPALLY NORTH, KUMARAPURAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to admit the appeal when the decree amount is stated to be fully satisfied.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Azad P.
- appellant
Sathyamma
- respondent
Aji
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court