Ramya v. Shinu
Case brief
What is this about?
Two matrimonial appeals arising from Family Court orders were finally heard. The appellant counsel submitted that the appeals were not pursued. Consequently, the High Court dismissed both appeals as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
Both matrimonial appeals were dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 25TH ASWINA, 1945
MAT.APPEAL NO. 211 OF 2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP NO.589/2017 RENDERED AS COMMON
JUDGMENT IN OP NOS.589/2017 AND 590/2017 OF THE FAMILY COURT,
TIRUR DATED 22.01.2020
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
RAMYA
AGED 28 YEARS
D/O. K.R.SIVAN, KOTHOD VEEDU,
KANHIRAMUKKU P.O., PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramya
- respondent
Shinu
- respondent
Shymol
- respondent
Subhash
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court