Dismissed
Davi v.Thattil v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCCrl.MC/789/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 24TH JYAISHTA, 1945
CRL.MC NO. 789 OF 2016
CC 96/2013 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ,THRISSUR
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:
DAVI V.THATTIL
S/O.VARGHESE THATTIL, PIDIYATH HOUSE,
CHELEKOTTUKARA, THRISSUR.
BY ADVS.
SRI.LINDONS C.DAVIS
SMT.E.U.DHANYA
RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
2ANTHONY
S/O.VARUNNY, KADAVIL, ALUM VETTU VAZHI DESOM,
CHIYAARAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK - 680 026.
BY ADVS.
SRI.AJEESH CHANDRAN
SRI.AJEESH CHANDRAN
SRI.P.A.CHANDRAN
ADV SEETHA S -SR PP
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
2
CRL.MC NO. 789 OF 2016
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner upon instructions
submits that trial in C.C. No.96/2013 on the files of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thrissur is already over and the petitioner acquitted.
In such circumstances, this Crl.M.C. has become infructuous.
Accordingly, it is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE
scs
DAVI V.THATTIL
STATE OF KERALA
ANTHONY
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court