The court held the criminal miscellaneous petition infructuous because the trial court had already convicted the petitioner at the conclusion of the trial, rendering the prayer for quashing unnecessary.
The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition was closed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 24TH KARTHIKA,
1945
CRL.MC NO. 5857 OF 2020
CRIME NO.5/2011 OF VACB, KOLLAM,
PETITIONER/S:
S.REMAKUMARI
AGED 64 YEARS
W/O.LATE RADHAKRISHNAN, PARANKAMOOTTIL,
PUTHIYAVILAMURI, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK,
ALAPPUZHA (WORKED AS PRINCIPAL, JFKMVHSS
AYANIVELIKKULANGARA, KARUNAGAPPALLY) (RETIRED
FROM SERVICE ON 31.03.2015).
BY ADVS.
K.K.VIJAYAN
SRI.G.RANJU MOHAN
RESPONDENT/S:
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV GOVERNMENT PLEADER
OTHER PRESENT:
RAJESH A,SPL GP VIGILANCE,REKHA SR PP
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 15.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED
THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C. No.5857 of 2020
..2..
K. BABU, J
Crl.M.C. No.5857 of 2020
Dated this the 15th day of November, 2023
O R D E R
The prayer in the Crl.M.C. is as follows:-
“… to quash Annexure-A FIR and Annexure B Final Report in Crime No.5/2011 registered by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau against the petitioner, to secure the ends of justice”.
The Crl.M.C., is, therefore, closed as infructuous.
Sd/K.BABU, JUDGE
kkj
Crl.M.C. No.5857 of 2020
..3..
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5857/2020
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1TRUE COPY OF THE FIR DATED 22.06.2011
IN VC-05/2011/KLM.
ANNEXURE A2THE TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN
VC 05/2011/KLM.
S. REMAKUMARI
STATE OF KERALA
K. BABU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court