C. Murali v. Anu
Case brief
What is this about?
In Crl.M.C. 1793 of 2013, the Kerala High Court dismissed the petition as closed, stating the original warrant was from 2013. The court invited the petitioner to file a fresh application if the grievance subsists.
What did the court decide?
Crl.M.C. closed; petitioner directed to approach court with proper application if grievance subsists.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 25TH JYAISHTA, 1945
CRL.MC NO. 1793 OF 2013
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MC 517/2010 OF FAMILY COURT,
IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER/S:
C. MURALI
AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.LATE CHANDRAN, MOTOR
MECHANIC,ALAIKKAL HOUSE, RESIDING AT NO.7, 5TH
CROSS,GUPTA LAYOUT ULSOOR, BANGALORE - 56008.
BY ADV SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM
RESPONDENT/S:
1ANU
AGED 29 YEARS, D/O.KONIKKARA RAMAKRISHNAN,
KONIKKARADESOM, P.O.KONIKKARA TRIKKUR VILLAGE,
MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, TRICHUR DISTRICT, PINCODE - 680306.
2SONALI DO.ANU KONIKKARA DESOM P.O.KONIKKARA TRIKKUR
VILLAGE
MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, TRICHUR DISTRICT PINCODE - 680306.
BY ADVS.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any challenge survives against a warrant issued in 2013.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C. MURALI
- respondent
ANU
- respondent
SONALI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court