Muhammed Shameem @ Shameem v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court held that a Criminal Miscellaneous petition filed to quash proceedings was infructuous due to the elapsed time. Consequently, the court closed the petition without passing an interim order.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Miscellaneous petition was closed as the prayer was held to be infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 12TH KARTHIKA, 1945
CRL.MC NO. 1689 OF 2016
CRIME NO.812/2013 OF MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MC 49/2013 OF SUB DIVISIONAL
MAGISTRATE,OTTAPPALAM
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
MUHAMMED SHAMEEM @ SHAMEEM S/O. MUHAMMEDALI,AGED 23 YEARS, VAISYAM HOUSE,KODATHIPADI, MANNARKAD, PALAKKAD.
BY ADV SRI.T.K.SANDEEP
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT AND STATE:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer to quash proceedings is infructuous given the passage of time.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUHAMMED SHAMEEM
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court