Seena R.Sethu v. Peter Thomas
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dismissed the criminal appeal as abated, recording that the accused in the underlying trial case had expired on the same day of admission (16.08.2023).
High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dismissed the criminal appeal as abated, recording that the accused in the underlying trial case had expired on the same day of admission (16.08.2023).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023/25TH SRAVANA, 1945
CRL.A NO. 731 OF 2017
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT LEAVE PETITION NO.76/2017 OF HIGH COURT
OF KERALA
ST 8/2016 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -III, MAVELIKKARA APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT:
SEENA R.SETHU MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S, TRAVANCORE CHITS AND BANKERS, MAVELIKKARA
BY ADVS. SRI.N.J.MATHEWS SRI.CIBI K.CHERIAN SMT.LAISA B.JOSE
RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED & STATE:
1 PETER THOMAS AGED 51 YEARS, CHINGANAKULANGARA HOUSE, PALLIKKAL EAST, KURATHIKADU, MAVELIKKARA.
2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. SRI.P G MANU, SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.A NO. 731 OF 2017
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 16th day of August, 2023
The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appeal has become infructuous since the accused in ST 8/2016 expired. Recording the submission, this appeal stands dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
A. BADHARUDEEN
JUDGE
nkr
SEENA R.SETHU MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S, TRAVANCORE CHITS AND BANKERS, MAVELIKKARA
1 PETER THOMAS
STATE OF KERALA
A. BADHARUDEEN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court