Criminal Appeal filed by complainant against acquittal of accused in cheque dishonour case dismissed as withdrawn after accused paid entire compensation amount subsequently.
Criminal Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 20TH ASWINA, 1945
CRL.A NO. 1175 OF 2011
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 853/2004 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,CHAVAKKAD
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN APPEAL NO.143/2007 OF THE ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FAST TRACK COURT NO.-1, THRISSUR
Crl.L.P. 447/2011 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
N.K.SURENDRAN, S/O KRISHNANKUTTY,
NEDIYEDATH HOUSE,THIRUVATHRA,CHAVAKKAD,TALUK
BY ADV SRI.RAJIT
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT/ACCUSED AND STATE:
1K.V.RUKHIYA AND ANOTHER
AKALAD P.O.,CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
2STATE OF KERALA
REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM
BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT SEETHA S
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl. Appeal NO.1175 OF 2011 2
Dated this the 12th day of October, 2023
JUDGMENT
The appeal is filed challenging the judgment passed by the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court No.1), Thrissur (Appellate Court) in Crl.AppealNo.143/2007 holding the first respondent/appellant/accused not guilty for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short, ‘N.I.Act’) and reversing the conviction and sentence passed by the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chavakkad (Trial Court) in C.C. No.853/2004 holding the first respondent/accused guilty for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I.Act. The appellant was the complainant and the first respondent was the accused before the Trial Court.
Crl. Appeal NO.1175 OF 2011 3
Prosecutor appearing for the second respondent-State.
In the light of the above submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/-
C.S.DIAS, JUDGE
rmm12/10/2023
N.K. SURENDRAN
K.V. RUKHIYA AND ANOTHER
STATE OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court