The appellant sought to withdraw the criminal appeal as the accused was no longer available. The court recorded the submission and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
The criminal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Crl A. No. 1014 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 27TH BHADRA, 1945
CRL.A NO. 1014 OF 2011
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CC 1102/2007 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
OF FIRST CLASS -I, ALAPPUZHA
APPELLANT/S:
S.PRASHOBHINI, D/O.SANTHAN
PALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VADACKAL, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV SRI.SIRAJ KAROLY
RESPONDENT/S:
1P.K.KUMARAN , SECRETARY SNDP
BRANCH NO.395, PARAVUR NORTH, PUNNAPRA,, ALAPPUZHA
DISTRICT-688013.
2STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.
SMT.BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN
SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR
SMT.T.J.SEEMA
SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR-R2
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
Crl A. No. 1014 of 2011
C.S DIAS,J.
Crl A. No. 1014 of 2011
----------------------------Dated this the 18th day of September, 2023
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant
submits that since the first respondent/accused is no
more, the appellant is no longer desirous of prosecuting
the appeal because no useful purpose would be served. Hence, the appellant is desirous of withdrawing the appeal. The said submission is recorded.
Resultantly, the criminal appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
SD/-
sks/18.9.2023
C.S.DIAS, JUDGE
S.PRA SHOBHINI
P.K.KUMARAN
STATE OF KERALA
C.S.DIAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court