Constitutional bench order closing a contempt petition for non-compliance of directions in W.P.(C) No.6603/2022 based on counsel submissions that orders were complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 965 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT WP(C) 6603/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
CONTEMPT PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC:
PRASEEDA VENU
AGED 54 YEARS
W/O OF LATE VENU M G , MADAKKAVIL HOUSE , INCHAMUDY
P.O., THRISSUR, KERALA, PIN – 680 564.
BY ADVS.
E.ADITHYAN
MEERA RAMESH
ALEENA JOSE
MRUDULA MOHAN
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT No.2 IN WPC:
VISHNU RAJ P
VISHNU RAJ P, IAS, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN
TO THE PETITIONER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/ SUB
COLLECTOR, RDO OFFICE, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM,
KERALA., PIN – 682 001.
BY ADV
PREMCHAND -GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 19.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case (C) No.965 of 2023
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 19 th day of July, 2023
Counsel on either side submit that the directions
contained in the judgment dated 03.11.2022 in W.P.(C) No.6603 of 2022 stand complied with and therefore no further orders are required in the Contempt of Court Case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt of Court
Case is closed.
Sd/N .NAGARESH JUDGE
AMR
PRASEEDA VENU
VISHNU RAJ P
N.NAGARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court