Dr. Anitha I v. Ishita Roy IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition regarding an issued government order, the Court closed the case, ruling that the validity of the order is not to be decided under contempt jurisdiction and accused the petitioner to approach appropriate remedies.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed with liberty fully reserved to the petitioner to invoke appropriate remedies against the impugned order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 5TH JYAISHTA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 822 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 29048/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
DR. ANITHA I W/O. DR. K. GIRISH KUMAR, AGED 58 YEARS PRINCIPAL (RTD), K.K.T.M GOVT. COLLEGE, PULLUT, KODUNGALLUR, RESIDING AT 'KAVYAM' K.K. LANE, TOLL JUNCTION, EDAPPALLY PO, KOCHI, PIN - 682024 BY ADVS. K.MADHUSOODANAN MATHEW JACOB (KUNNATHU) SYRIAC JOSEPH CAROLIN MARIA ALEX AMALA VS
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2:
1 ISHITA ROY I.A.S. (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (NOW DESIGNATED AS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY), DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 4TH FLOOR, ANNEXE II, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 V.VIGNESWARI. I.A.S. (AGE AND FATHERS' NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, 6TH FLOOR, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 SRI.V.VENUGOPAL - GP
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DR. ANITHA I W/O. DR. K. GIRISH KUMAR
- respondent
ISHITA ROY I.A.S.
- respondent
V.VIGNESWARI. I.A.S.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court