Benny.K.T v. Haritha.v.Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a contempt petition after respondents complied by removing encroachments and placing an Action Taken Report on record, reserving liberty for the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; liberty reserved for petitioner to seek further relief if required.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 22ND BHADRA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 280 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT WP(C) 874/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC :
BENNY.K.T., AGED 51 YEARS, S/O THOMAS, KUNALIL HOUSE, KUMARANELLUR P.O., WADAKKANCHERY, THRISSUR, PIN -
680590
BY ADVS. A.V.JOJO A.X.VARGHESE
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5 IN WPC:
1 HARITHA.V.KUMAR(FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER), THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680003
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BENNY.K.T.
- respondent
HARITHA.V.KUMAR
- respondent
SUMA.S
- respondent
HARISH.S
- respondent
SEBASTIAN SAMUEL
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court